(remember: enlarged by double clicking on the image. Back by clicking the left arrow blue top left.'s Vs.schermo)
from: http://www.gscproxitalia.com/ which translates from the English
www.georgesonshareholder.com / argentina
perhaps signaling legal skills to help as many sentences, judges and courts cite fewer rating changes, or set deadlines for the collapse Argentina (or what they see as the date beyond which the banks could not NOT KNOW .....) often more recent than it might seem to be an economist and you are based on reviews it removes responsibility from the BANKS perhaps more than they deserve. (some magistrate, despite his honest 'and integrity' of the trial was' addirittuta approached a few months or days of the date of declaration of default.SPERIAMO THAT THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USEFUL TO ALL COURTS).
As you can see here is from
February 10, 1999 (LI RATING IN WHICH WAS CONFIRMED BEFORE BUT WITH NEGATIVE OUTLOOK)
that began the descent of the rating, and did not stop until more the default!
Note also that there are (listed) review procedures that were completed without changes in the ratings, but with negative predictions.
See also the chart published in the authoritative newspaper THE SUN XXIV
HOURS ON Saturday, April 1, 2006 and entitled "collapse."
you may have noticed that since 1986 there has never been a better rating of Ba3 ... think ......
0 comments:
Post a Comment